Thursday, November 3, 2011

How the "Bernie" dance ended the Perry Hall soccer team's season


NOVEMBER 3, 2011

Perry Hall boys soccer forfeits Class 4A North semifinal after allegations of taunting

By Todd Karpovich
Special to The Baltimore Sun
Officials at Perry Hall have decided to forfeit their boys soccer team’s upcoming Class 4A North Region semifinal game following allegations of taunting after the Gators’ 2-1 win at Dulaney in Tuesday’s quarterfinal.
Several family members of Dulaney players sent emails to Perry Hall principal George Roberts complaining about the Gators’ celebration following their victory. One alleged the Perry Hall players made “lewd and suggestive movements that showed absolutely no respect or sportsmanship.”
Players told coach Pete Eibner that they were imitating a dance called the “Bernie” performed by Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs and running back Ray Rice after big plays, but that they were not taunting anyone from Dulaney.
Roberts said he spent more than eight hours Wednesday interviewing players and coaches and sorting through emails from people who were at the game to determine what happened during the celebration. After compiling all of the information, Roberts decided the best course of action was to terminate the rest of the season.
“No educator likes to see kids that upset,” said Roberts, who noted that there was no video available of the incident. “Depending on whom you ask, the [players’] dance was either offensive or non-offensive. Based on the information I received, my concern was that they engaged in a celebratory dance at that time and in the manner that they did. Ray Rice might do that dance, but performs in front of 60,000 people. He is a pro athlete and is paid to play. These are high school athletes.”
The Gators were scheduled to play James Hubert Blake in the regional semifinals Friday. A forfeit would result in James Hubert Blake automatically advancing to the regional final.
Parents and players from Perry Hall are trying to convince Roberts to reverse his decision before that.
Dave Liberto, who has a son on the soccer team and works as a liaison between the Perry Hall boosters and the team, said there was no taunting and the players were simply celebrating the victory. He said the players did a similar dance after their first-round playoff victory over Sherwood.
He said the Dulaney parents might have taken offense because the celebration was done on the Lions' side of the field.
“It was merely a simple, celebratory ‘Bernie’ dance,” Liberto said Thursday. “For them to cancel the season on us is brutal. [Roberts] can reverse his decision today and they guys can start training tomorrow. It's a big deal. We're a solid squad, and these guys have done a lot of good things.”
Liberto said some students held an impromptu protest outside the school Thursday morning.
Dave Carder, a Dulaney fan who emailed Roberts to complain about Perry Hall's celebration, said that at the end of the match, the Perry Hall players gathered in the center of the field and jogged over toward the Lions' fans. He said he initially thought they were going to applaud the fans, which is a tradition among soccer teams, but they instead broke into the controversial celebration.
"Several of them did a very noticeable pelvic thrust at the crowd and were pointing at their privates at the same time. It was 10 seconds," said Carder, who has a son on Dulaney's junior varsity team. "It was absolutely shocking. I was one of about a dozen Dulaney supporters who wrote an email to the principal. I spoke to him that night and I spoke to him the next morning. I wanted to register my disgust and my displeasure with him directly, because I'm involved in soccer. It was fine game. There was no particular animosity during the game.
"I find myself having mixed emotions about it, but I think it's the right decision. You can assume there were some ring leaders and some kids who just went along because of peer pressure. I feel bad for the kids who had nothing to do with what it was."
Ned Sparks, executive director of the Maryland Public Secondary School Athletic Association, supported Roberts’ decision and he said it was Roberts’ prerogative to take any action he thought was necessary under the circumstances.
“We have to remember this is education-based,” Sparks said. “This isn't the rec league or AAU. He took action he deemed needed to be taken. From a point of view of teaching good behavior, to the point of view of sportsmanship, to the point of view of setting the tone for what level of behavior is expected, he should be applauded. They are high school kids and they're held to a different standard.”
Eibner said he did not see the incident following Tuesday’s game because he was talking to his own players and consoling two Dulaney players.
“We have said all season long that we win with class, lose with dignity,” Eibner said. “I cannot say that the boys handled themselves with class, because they obviously did something that was interpreted by their parents as taunting. They are now having their dignity stripped from them, and our goal is to hold our heads high through it.”
Dulaney coach Jerry Tana also said he did not see the dance by the Perry Hall players. However, he said Eibner has always been a role model for sportsmanship.
“I know that Pete feels terrible, and I feel terrible,” Tana said. “They played a good game and won fair and square. However, in this day of society, with the emphasis being good sports, that kind of conduct cannot be tolerated. I’ve seen brawls break out among high school players for less than that. I do feel bad for Pete. He’s a good guy and a good coach. They have a good program. We have a lot of respect for their program and their school. We hope there’s a bigger lesson here than winning games that can be passed down to all Baltimore County high schools. I feel terrible their program is not going forward.”
Perry Hall athletic director Robert Hruz and Dulaney athletic director Mike Lafferty could not be reached for comment.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Survey describes Dundalk's reputation: rough, with water views - baltimoresun.com

Survey describes Dundalk's reputation: rough, with water views - baltimoresun.com: "Lifelong Dundalk resident Scott Holupka has heard the jokes. He's heard Dundalk residents stereotyped as some "combination of Archie Bunker and a West Virginia hillbilly," the community knocked as dirty, industrial and smelly."

'via Blog this'

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Baltimore County Courts Maryland (MD)

Are you looking for the courthouses in Baltimore County, Maryland (MD)?  There is one Circuit Court building in Baltimore County, MD and three District Court houses in Baltimore County, Maryland.

Contact the office 24/7 at 410-288-2900 for immediate legal help.

Baltimore County Circuit Court
401 Bosley Avenue
Towson, Maryland 21204


View Larger Map of the Baltimore County Circuit Court

Contact the office 24/7 at 410-288-2900 for immediate legal help.


Towson District Court - Baltimore County District Court
120 E. Chesapeake Avenue
Towson, Maryland 21286


View Larger Map of the Towson District Court

Contact the office 24/7 at 410-288-2900 for immediate legal help.


Essex District Court - Baltimore County District Court
8914 Kelso Drive
Essex, Maryland 21221-3135


View Larger Map of Essex District Court

Contact the office 24/7 at 410-288-2900 for immediate legal help.


Catonsville District Court - Baltimore County District Court
900 Walker Avenue
Catonsville, Maryland 21228


View Larger Map of Catonsville District Court

Contact the office 24/7 at 410-288-2900 for immediate legal help.

Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC
6914 Holabird Avenue, Suite A
Dundalk, Maryland 21222


View Larger Map of the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC

Criminal Defense Lawyer, DUI, DWI, & Drunk Driving Defense Attorney, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Truck Accident, Motorcycle Accident, Injury Attorney, Serving the residents of Baltimore County, Harford County, Howard County, Anne Arundel County, Maryland.

Contact the office 24/7 at 410-288-2900 for immediate legal help.



Friday, September 16, 2011

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Black and White Pens in Baltimore Maryland

Have you found one of the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC, black and white pens around Baltimore, Maryland.  We have over half a million pens in stores, bars, and restaurants in and around Baltimore, Maryland.  The Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC, provides the residents of Baltimore County, Harford County, Howard County, Anne Arundel County and all of Maryland with Criminal Defense, DUI, DWI, Traffic Violation, Personal Injury legal advise.


If you have a business and would like to receive some of the Black and White pens, contact the office at 410-288-2900 and we can have pens delivered to your business.

Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC
6914 Holabird Avenue, Suite A
Baltimore, Maryland 21222
410-288-2900

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Peace Order Statute for Maryland

Maryland Peace Order Statute  - If you are facing a Peace Order Hearing in Baltimore County, Maryland, contact the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC, at 410-288-2900 to discuss your case and schedule a free consultation.

*** Current through chapters of the 2011 Regular Session of the General Assembly that took effect through July 1, 2011 ***

COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS 
TITLE 3. COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION -- JURISDICTION/SPECIAL CAUSES OF ACTION 
SUBTITLE 15. PEACE ORDERS

Md. COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Code Ann. (2011)

§ 3-1501. Definitions
(a) In general. -- In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated.

(b) Commissioner. -- "Commissioner" means a District Court commissioner appointed in accordance with Article IV, § 41G of the Maryland Constitution.

(c) Court. -- "Court" means the District Court of Maryland.

(d) Final peace order. -- "Final peace order" means a peace order issued by a judge under § 3-1505 of this subtitle.

(e) Interim peace order. -- "Interim peace order" means an order that a commissioner issues under this subtitle pending a hearing by a judge on a petition.

(f) Petitioner. -- "Petitioner" means an individual who files a petition under § 3-1503 of this subtitle.

(g) Residence. -- "Residence" includes the yard, grounds, outbuildings, and common areas surrounding the residence.

(h) Respondent. -- "Respondent" means an individual alleged in a petition to have committed an act specified in § 3-1503(a) of this subtitle against a petitioner.

(i) Temporary peace order. -- "Temporary peace order" means a peace order issued by a judge under § 3-1504 of this subtitle.

§ 3-1502. Exclusivity; applicability of subtitle
(a) Other remedies generally not precluded. -- By proceeding under this subtitle, a petitioner is not limited to or precluded from pursuing any other legal remedy.

(b) Circumstances where subtitle is inapplicable. -- This subtitle does not apply to:

(1) A petitioner who is a person eligible for relief, as defined in § 4-501 of the Family Law Article; or

(2) A respondent who is a child at the time of the alleged commission of an act specified in § 3-1503 (a) of this subtitle.

§ 3-1503. Petition seeking relief
(a) Underlying acts. -- A petitioner may seek relief under this subtitle by filing with the court, or with a commissioner under the circumstances specified in § 3-1503.1(a) of this subtitle, a petition that alleges the commission of any of the following acts against the petitioner by the respondent, if the act occurred within 30 days before the filing of the petition:

(1) An act that causes serious bodily harm;

(2) An act that places the petitioner in fear of imminent serious bodily harm;

(3) Assault in any degree;

(4) Rape or sexual offense under §§ 3-303 through 3-308 of the Criminal Law Article or attempted rape or sexual offense in any degree;

(5) False imprisonment;

(6) Harassment under § 3-803 of the Criminal Law Article;

(7) Stalking under § 3-802 of the Criminal Law Article;

(8) Trespass under Title 6, Subtitle 4 of the Criminal Law Article; or

(9) Malicious destruction of property under § 6-301 of the Criminal Law Article.

(b) Contents. --

(1) The petition shall:
(i) Be under oath and provide notice to the petitioner that an individual who knowingly provides false information in the petition is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to the penalties specified in subsection (d) of this section;
(ii) Subject to the provisions of subsection (c) of this section, contain the address of the petitioner; and
(iii) Include all information known to the petitioner of:

1. The nature and extent of the act specified in subsection (a) of this section for which the relief is being sought, including information known to the petitioner concerning previous harm or injury resulting from an act specified in subsection (a) of this section by the respondent;

2. Each previous and pending action between the parties in any court; and

3. The whereabouts of the respondent.

(c) Address may be stricken. -- If, in a proceeding under this subtitle, a petitioner alleges, and the commissioner or judge finds, that the disclosure of the address of the petitioner would risk further harm to the petitioner, that address may be stricken from the petition and omitted from all other documents filed with the commissioner or filed with, or transferred to, a court.

(d) Providing false information. -- An individual who knowingly provides false information in a petition filed under this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to a fine not exceeding $ 1,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or both.

§ 3-1503.1. Petition seeking relief -- Filing with commissioner; peace orders; penalties
(a) When to file. -- A petition under this subtitle may be filed with a commissioner when the Office of the District Court Clerk is not open for business.

(b) Interim peace order. -- If a petition is filed with a commissioner and the commissioner finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has committed, and is likely to commit in the future, an act specified in § 3-1503(a) of this subtitle against the petitioner, the commissioner may issue an interim peace order to protect the petitioner.

(c) Interim peace order -- Scope. -- An interim peace order:

(1) Shall contain only the relief that is minimally necessary to protect the petitioner; and

(2) May order the respondent to:

(i) Refrain from committing or threatening to commit an act specified in § 3-1503(a) of this subtitle against the petitioner;

(ii) Refrain from contacting, attempting to contact, or harassing the petitioner;

(iii) Refrain from entering the residence of the petitioner; and

(iv) Remain away from the place of employment, school, or temporary residence of the petitioner.

(d) Interim peace order -- Contents; notice. --

(1) (i) An interim peace order shall state the date, time, and location for the temporary peace order hearing and a tentative date, time, and location for a final peace order hearing.

(ii) A temporary peace order hearing shall be held on the first or second day on which a District Court judge is sitting after issuance of the interim peace order, unless the court continues the hearing for good cause.

(2) An interim peace order shall include in at least 10-point bold type:

(i) Notice to the respondent that:

1. The respondent must give the court written notice of each change of address;

2. If the respondent fails to appear at the temporary peace order hearing or any later hearing, the respondent may be served with any other orders or notices in the case by first-class mail at the respondent's last known address;

3. The date, time, and location of the final peace order hearing is tentative only, and subject to change; and

4. If the respondent does not attend the temporary peace order hearing, the respondent may call the Office of the Clerk of the District Court at the number provided in the order to find out the actual date, time, and location of any final peace order hearing;

(ii) A statement of all possible forms and duration of relief that a temporary peace order or final peace order may contain;

(iii) Notice to the petitioner and respondent that, at the hearing, a judge may issue a temporary peace order that grants any or all of the relief requested in the petition or may deny the petition, whether or not the respondent is in court;

(iv) A warning to the respondent that violation of an interim peace order is a crime and that a law enforcement officer shall arrest the respondent, with or without a warrant, and take the respondent into custody if the officer has probable cause to believe that the respondent has violated any provision of the interim peace order; and

(v) The phone number of the Office of the District Court Clerk.

(e) Duties of commissioner issuing order. -- Whenever a commissioner issues an interim peace order, the commissioner shall:

(1) Immediately forward a copy of the petition and interim peace order to the appropriate law enforcement agency for service on the respondent; and

(2) Before the hearing scheduled in the interim peace order, transfer the case file and the return of service, if any, to the Office of the District Court Clerk.

(f) Duties of law enforcement officer. -- A law enforcement officer shall:

(1) Immediately on receipt of a petition and interim peace order, serve them on the respondent named in the order; and

(2) Immediately after service, make a return of service to the commissioner's office or, if the Office of the District Court Clerk is open for business, to the clerk.

(g) Length of effectiveness of order. -- An interim peace order shall be effective until the earlier of:

(1) The temporary peace order hearing under § 3-1504 of this subtitle; or

(2) The end of the second business day the Office of the Clerk of the District Court is open following the issuance of an interim peace order.

(h) Commissioner's decision not binding on judge. -- A decision of a commissioner to grant or deny relief under this section is not binding on, and does not affect any power granted to or duty imposed on, a judge of a circuit court or the District Court under any law, including any power to grant or deny a petition for a temporary peace order or final peace order.

(i) Penalties for providing false information. -- An individual who knowingly provides false information in a petition filed under this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to a fine not exceeding $ 1,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or both.

§ 3-1504. Temporary peace orders
(a) Authorized; forms of relief available. --

(1) If after a hearing on a petition, whether ex parte or otherwise, a judge finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has committed, and is likely to commit in the future, an act specified in § 3-1503 (a) of this subtitle against the petitioner, the judge may issue a temporary peace order to protect the petitioner.

(2) The temporary peace order may include any or all of the following relief:

(i) Order the respondent to refrain from committing or threatening to commit an act specified in § 3-1503 (a) of this subtitle against the petitioner;

(ii) Order the respondent to refrain from contacting, attempting to contact, or harassing the petitioner;

(iii) Order the respondent to refrain from entering the residence of the petitioner; and

(iv) Order the respondent to remain away from the place of employment, school, or temporary residence of the petitioner.

(3) If the judge issues an order under this section, the order shall contain only the relief that is minimally necessary to protect the petitioner.

(b) Immediate service. --

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a law enforcement officer immediately shall serve the temporary peace order on the respondent.

(2) A respondent who has been served with an interim peace order under § 3-1503.1 of this subtitle shall be served with the temporary peace order in open court or, if the respondent is not present at the temporary peace order hearing, by first-class mail at the respondent's last known address.

(c) Length of effectiveness. --

(1) The temporary peace order shall be effective for not more than 7 days after service of the order.

(2) The judge may extend the temporary peace order as needed, but not to exceed 30 days, to effectuate service of the order where necessary to provide protection or for other good cause.

(d) Final peace order hearing. -- The judge may proceed with a final peace order hearing instead of a temporary peace order hearing if:

(1) (i) The respondent appears at the hearing;

(ii) The respondent has been served with an interim peace order; or

(iii) The court otherwise has personal jurisdiction over the respondent; and

(2) The petitioner and the respondent expressly consent to waive the temporary peace order hearing.

§ 3-1505. Respondent's opportunity to be heard; peace order hearing; forms of relief
(a) Respondent's opportunity to be heard. -- A respondent shall have an opportunity to be heard on the question of whether the judge should issue a final peace order.

(b) Peace order hearing -- Date and time; notice. --

(1) (i) The temporary peace order shall state the date and time of the final peace order hearing.

(ii) Unless continued for good cause, the final peace order hearing shall be held no later than 7 days after the temporary peace order is served on the respondent.

(2) The temporary peace order shall include notice to the respondent:

(i) In at least 10-point bold type, that if the respondent fails to appear at the final peace order hearing, the respondent may be served by first-class mail at the respondent's last known address with the final peace order and all other notices concerning the final peace order;

(ii) Specifying all the possible forms of relief under subsection (d) of this section that the final peace order may contain;

(iii) That the final peace order shall be effective for the period stated in the order, not to exceed 6 months; and

(iv) In at least 10-point bold type, that the respondent must notify the court in writing of any change of address.

(c) Peace order hearing -- Proceeding; issuance of order. --

(1) If the respondent appears for the final peace order hearing, has been served with an interim peace order or a temporary peace order, or the court otherwise has personal jurisdiction over the respondent, the judge:

(i) May proceed with the final peace order hearing; and

(ii) If the judge finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent has committed, and is likely to commit in the future, an act specified in § 3-1503(a) of this subtitle against the petitioner, or if the respondent consents to the entry of a peace order, the court may issue a final peace order to protect the petitioner.

(2) A final peace order may be issued only to an individual who has filed a petition under § 3-1503 of this subtitle.

(3) In cases where both parties file a petition under § 3-1503 of this subtitle, the judge may issue mutual peace orders if the judge finds by clear and convincing evidence that each party has committed, and is likely to commit in the future, an act specified in § 3-1503(a) of this subtitle against the other party.

(d) Peace order -- Forms of relief. --

(1) The final peace order may include any or all of the following relief:

(i) Order the respondent to refrain from committing or threatening to commit an act specified in § 3-1503(a) of this subtitle against the petitioner;

(ii) Order the respondent to refrain from contacting, attempting to contact, or harassing the petitioner;

(iii) Order the respondent to refrain from entering the residence of the petitioner;

(iv) Order the respondent to remain away from the place of employment, school, or temporary residence of the petitioner;

(v) Direct the respondent or petitioner to participate in professionally supervised counseling or, if the parties are amenable, mediation; and

(vi) Order either party to pay filing fees and costs of a proceeding under this subtitle.

(2) If the judge issues an order under this section, the order shall contain only the relief that is minimally necessary to protect the petitioner.

(e) Peace order -- Service. --

(1) A copy of the final peace order shall be served on the petitioner, the respondent, the appropriate law enforcement agency, and any other person the court determines is appropriate, in open court or, if the person is not present at the final peace order hearing, by first-class mail to the person's last known address.

(2) (i) A copy of the final peace order served on the respondent in accordance with paragraph (1) of this subsection constitutes actual notice to the respondent of the contents of the final peace order.

(ii) Service is complete upon mailing.

(f) Length of effectiveness. -- All relief granted in a final peace order shall be effective for the period stated in the order, not to exceed 6 months.

§ 3-1506. Modification; rescission; appeals
(a) Modification; rescission. -- A peace order may be modified or rescinded during the term of the peace order after:

(1) Giving notice to the petitioner and the respondent; and

(2) A hearing.

(b) Appeal to circuit court. --

(1) If a District Court judge grants or denies relief under a petition filed under this subtitle, a respondent or a petitioner may appeal to the circuit court for the county where the District Court is located.

(2) An appeal taken under this subsection to the circuit court shall be heard de novo in the circuit court.

(3) (i) If an appeal is filed under this subsection, the District Court judgment shall remain in effect until superseded by a judgment of the circuit court.

(ii) Unless the circuit court orders otherwise, modification or enforcement of the District Court order shall be by the District Court.

§ 3-1507. Statement concerning violations
(a) In general. -- An interim peace order, temporary peace order, and final peace order issued under this subtitle shall state that a violation of the order may result in:

(1) Criminal prosecution; and

(2) Imprisonment or fine or both.

(b) Temporary and final peace orders. -- A temporary peace order and final peace order issued under this subtitle shall state that a violation of the order may result in a finding of contempt.

§ 3-1508. Penalties
(a) Fines or imprisonment. -- An individual who fails to comply with the relief granted in an interim peace order under § 3-1503.1 of this subtitle, a temporary peace order under § 3-1504(a)(2) of this subtitle, or a final peace order under § 3-1505(d)(1)(i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) of this subtitle is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject, for each offense, to a fine not exceeding $ 1,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or both.

(b) Arrest. -- A law enforcement officer shall arrest with or without a warrant and take into custody an individual who the officer has probable cause to believe is in violation of an interim peace order, temporary peace order, or final peace order in effect at the time of the violation.

§ 3-1509. Rules and forms
(a) Authorized. -- The Court of Appeals may adopt rules and forms to implement the provisions of this subtitle.

(b) Petition form. --

(1) The Court of Appeals shall adopt a form for a petition under this subtitle.

(2) A petition form shall contain notice to a petitioner that an individual who knowingly provides false information in a petition filed under this subtitle is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to the penalties specified in § 3-1503 (d) of this subtitle.

§ 3-1510. Shielding of records
(a) Definitions. --

(1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated.

(2) (i) "Court record" means an official record of a court about a proceeding that the clerk of a court or other court personnel keeps.

(ii) "Court record" includes:

1. An index, a docket entry, a petition, a memorandum, a transcription of proceedings, an electronic recording, an order, and a judgment; and

2. Any electronic information about a proceeding on the website maintained by the Maryland Judiciary.

(3) "Shield" means to remove information from public inspection in accordance with this section.

(4) "Shielding" means:

(i) With respect to a record kept in a courthouse, removing to a separate secure area to which persons who do not have a legitimate reason for access are denied access; and

(ii) With respect to electronic information about a proceeding on the website maintained by the Maryland Judiciary, removing the information from the public website.

(5) "Victim services provider" means a nonprofit organization that has been authorized by the Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention or the Department of Human Services to have access to records of shielded peace orders in order to assist victims of abuse.

(b) Written request. -- If a petition filed under this subtitle is denied or dismissed at the interim, temporary, or final peace order stage of a proceeding under this subtitle, the respondent may file a written request to shield all court records relating to the proceeding.

(c) Timing. -- A request for shielding under this section may not be filed within 3 years after the denial or dismissal of the petition unless the respondent files with the request a general waiver and release of all the respondent's tort claims related to the proceeding under this subtitle.

(d) Notice, hearing and findings. --

(1) On the filing of a request for shielding under this section, the court shall schedule a hearing on the request.

(2) The court shall give notice of the hearing to the petitioner or the petitioner's counsel of record.

(3) Except as provided in paragraphs (4) and (5) of this subsection, after the hearing, the court shall order the shielding of all court records relating to the proceeding if the court finds:

(i) That the petition was denied or dismissed at the interim, temporary, or final peace order stage of the proceeding;

(ii) That a final peace order or protective order has not been previously issued in a proceeding between the petitioner and the respondent; and

(iii) That none of the following are pending at the time of the hearing:

1. An interim or temporary peace order or protective order issued in a proceeding between the petitioner and the respondent; or

2. A criminal charge against the respondent arising from an alleged act described in § 3-1503(a) of this subtitle against the petitioner.

(4) (i) If the petitioner appears at the shielding hearing and objects to the shielding, the court may, for good cause, deny the shielding.

(ii) In determining whether there is good cause to grant the request to shield court records, the court shall balance the privacy of the respondent and potential danger of adverse consequences to the respondent against the potential risk of future harm and danger to the petitioner and the community.

(5) Information about the proceeding may not be removed from the Domestic Violence Central Repository.

(e) Access to shielded record. --

(1) This section does not preclude the following persons from accessing a shielded record for a legitimate reason:

(i) A law enforcement officer;

(ii) An attorney who represents or has represented the petitioner or the respondent in a proceeding;

(iii) A State's Attorney;

(iv) An employee of a local department of social services; or

(v) A victim services provider.

(2) (i) A person not listed in paragraph (1) of this subsection may subpoena, or file a motion for access to, a record shielded under this section.

(ii) If the court finds that the person has a legitimate reason for access, the court may grant the person access to the shielded record under the terms and conditions that the court determines.

(iii) In ruling on a motion under this paragraph, the court shall balance the person's need for access to the record with the respondent's right to privacy and the potential harm of unwarranted adverse consequences to the respondent that the disclosure may create.

(f) Compliance with order. -- Within 60 days after entry of an order under subsection (d)(3) of this section, each custodian of court records that are subject to the order of shielding shall advise in writing the court and the respondent of compliance with the order.

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Lawyers in Dundalk MD

Are you looking for lawyers in Dundalk, MD to handle your:

Lawyers in Dundalk MD
G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC
410-288-2900
6914 Holabird Avenue, Suite A
Dundalk, MD 21222

  • Criminal Defense;
  • DUI/DWI;
  • Personal Injury;
  • Car Accident;
  • Truck Accident;
  • Pedestrian Accident;
  • Wills;
  • Estates;
  • Worker's Compensation;
  • All other legal matters.
Contact the Dundalk MD Lawyer ranked a Best Law Firm in Baltimore by CitySpur.

Law Offices of
G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC
6914 Holabird Avenue, Suite A
Dundalk, Maryland 21222
410-288-2900 (office)
410-288-2988 (facsimile)
RiceLawMD@gmail.com

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Federal Law That Prohibits Certain Individuals to Possess a Firearm

Federal Law that Prohibits Certain Individuals to Possess Firearms

Not only does the state of Maryland prohibit certain individuals to possess a firearm, but Federal Law also prohibits the possession of firearms if one meets certain conditions.

Below find U.S. Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 44, § 922 that pertains to the prohibition of possessing firearms in part states:
Baltimore Criminal Lawyer
410-288-2900

(g) It shall be unlawful for any person—
  (1) who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
  (2) who is a fugitive from justice;
  (3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
  (4) who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution;
  (5) who, being an alien—
    (A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or
    (B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.1101 (a)(26)));
  (6) who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
  (7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship;
  (8) who is subject to a court order that—
    (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had an opportunity to participate;
    (B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child; and
   (C)
      (i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or
     (ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or
  (9) who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,

to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm (see below for definitions) or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

U.S. Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 44, § 921 provides the definitions for the previous section and states in part:

(3) The term “firearm” means
  (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive;
  (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon;
  (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or
  (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.

(16) The term “antique firearm” means—
  (A) any firearm (including any firearm with a matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system) manufactured in or before 1898; or
  (B) any replica of any firearm described in subparagraph (A) if such replica—
     (i) is not designed or redesigned for using rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition, or
     (ii) uses rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition which is no longer manufactured in the United States and which is not readily available in the ordinary channels of commercial trade; or
  (C) any muzzle loading rifle, muzzle loading shotgun, or muzzle loading pistol, which is designed to use black powder, or a black powder substitute, and which cannot use fixed ammunition. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “antique firearm” shall not include any weapon which incorporates a firearm frame or receiver, any firearm which is converted into a muzzle loading weapon, or any muzzle loading weapon which can be readily converted to fire fixed ammunition by replacing the barrel, bolt, breechblock, or any combination thereof.

If you have been charged in a Maryland State Court or U.S. Federal Court with illegal possession of a firearm, contact my office at 410-288-2900 to schedule a free consultation and learn how we can help.

Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC
6914 Holabird Avenue, Suite A
Baltimore, Maryland 21222
410-288-2900

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Attention: Stent Recipients at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, Maryland

Attention:  All Washington Adventist Hospital Heart Patients.  We know know that there were other cardiologists who implanted unnecessary coronary artery stents at Washington Adventist Hospital in Takoma Park, MD, and we know who they are.


These stents may have a significant impact on your future health insurance coverage.  You may be entitled to monetary compensation.  We are currently reviewing patients with unnecessary stents placement from St. Joseph Medical Center in Towson, MD, and Union Memorial Hospital in Baltimore, MD.
Washington Adventist Stent Lawyer
410.288.2900  All call confidential

If you have a coronary artery stent implanted between January 2005 and January 2010 at Washington Adventist Hospital, please call the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC at 410.288.2900 and speak with their medical malpractice attorney, G. Randolph Rice, Jr.  Or you can email Mr. Rice at RiceLawMD@gmail.com.

All inquiries will be kept confidential.  There is no charge for our consultation.  We do not need any records from your cardiologist at the present time, we only need you to call us at 410.288.2900.

We will send you our Stent Informational Packet for Washington Adventist Hospital.  You can complete the questionnaire in the confidence of your home and return to my office.  Our stent cardiologist will review your procedure, for free, and we will advise you as to a possible stent claim and lawsuit againt Washington Adventist Hospital.

Stent Lawsuit Washington Adventist Hospital
Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC
6914 Holabird Avenue, Suite A
Baltimore, Maryland 21222-1747
410.288.2900 (phone 24/7)
410.288.2988 (facsimile)

Do You Need to File a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Maryland?

As a Criminal Lawyer in Baltimore County, MD, we file petitions for writ of habeas corpus on a regular basis for our clients.  If you've been arrested in Baltimore County, MD, and a bail has been set that you believe is too high or you would like to have another bail review, we can file a writ of habeas corpus and have you before a Judge in the Circuit Court of Baltimore County within about a week.
Writ of Habeas Corpus
in Baltimore County, MD

Call our Writ of Habeas Corpus Lawyer at 410.288.2900 for immediate help and legal assistance.

A Writ of Habeas Corpus is a petition that a Maryland lawyer can file that alleges that a defendant is being confined or restrained of his liberty in violation of the U.S. Constitution, Amendment VIII ("Excessive bail should not be required...") and Maryland Declarations of Rights Article 25 ("Excessive bail ought not be required...").

As of the date of this blog entry, the filing fee for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is $145.00 payable to the Clerk of Court for the Circuit Court where the petition is filed.

You should seek the assistance of a Baltimore County Criminal Lawyer for filing a writ of habeas corpus.  We recently filed a petition seeking the reduction of a bail for a client.  The defendant was arrested in Baltimore City and was seen by a Judge at Central Booking.  The Judge set the bail for two cases extremely high for the defendant, who had never been arrested and had strong tied to the community.

We were able to file the petition on a Wednesday and were before a Judge in the Circuit Court by the following Monday.  If a loved one of family member is incarcerated and pending charges in the District Court, call our office at 410.288.2900 to discuss the options.  Writ of Habeas Corpus is only available for defendants that have not been charged in the Circuit Court.  Thus, if they are pending charges in the District Court or have not been indicted then a defendant can file a petition.


Call our Writ of Habeas Corpus Lawyer at 410.288.2900 for immediate help and legal assistance.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Beware of Hungry Judges


Beware of Hungry Judges
By Christopher Shea (Wall Street Journal - April 16, 2011)
A study of parole decisions in Israel indicates that if the judge hadn't taken a food break recently, the petitioner stood a greater chance of losing.
Researchers looked at 1,112 rulings involving requests for parole (or for changes of incarceration terms) presented to eight judges. They heard cases daily, interrupting for a morning snack and lunch.
The odds of an inmate receiving a favorable decision started at 65%, first thing in the morning, then steadily dropped until the snack break. If the judge heard eight cases in the morning, the average success rate for the last one was 25%. If the judge heard 12 cases, the average success rate for the final one was 0%. Favorable rulings popped back up to 65% when the judge returned, then slid again until lunchtime. The same pattern appeared post-lunch.
The authors could find no other factors that might explain the pattern beyond the hearing's timing, relative to the food breaks. They had no direct measure of the judges' mood.
"Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions," Shai Danziger, Jonathan Levav, and Liora Avnaim-Pesso, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (April 12)

Monday, April 18, 2011

Criminal Lawyer in Dundalk Maryland Call 410.288.2900 for Immediate Help

Suspect Arrested After Shooting and Barricade in Precinct 12/North Point Baltimore County Police Department.  

Randy Scott Digennaro has been arrested and charged for shooting a man in Precinct 12/North Point.Reprint from Baltimore County Police Department Press Release:  Baltimore County, Md. (April 18, 2011) - Randy Scott Digennaro, 55, of the 7800-block of Fairgreen Road, 21222 has been arrested and charged with attempted first degree murder, second degree assault, and use of a handgun during a felony violent crime after a shooting in Precinct 12/North Point.

Criminal Lawyer in Dundalk, Maryland, G. Randolph Rice, Jr., call 24/7 at 410.288.2900.

On April 15 at approximately 9:40 p.m., officers responded to the 7800-block of Fairgreen Road, 21222 for a shooting. Victim Brian Sheppard, 45, of the 3500-block of Louth Road, 21222 drove to the area to visit a friend. Before he could exit his vehicle, he was confronted by Randy Digennaro, who shot the victim multiple times with a handgun.


After the shooting, Randy Digennaro went back into his house and refused to surrender to police. The Hostage Negotiation Team and the Tactical Unit were called to the location. After several hours, the Tactical 
Unit entered the home and took the suspect into custody.


Criminal Lawyer in Dundalk, Maryland, G. Randolph Rice, Jr., call 24/7 at 410.288.2900.


The victim was transported to Bayview Hospital with serious injuries.


Randy Digennaro is currently being held without bail at the Baltimore County Detention Center.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Driver hits BP Station After Assault at Timonium Au Poiton Stil - Criminal Lawyer in Baltimore County, MD

Driver hits BP station after assault at Timonium eatery, police say
If you've been arrested in Timonium, Maryland for 2nd Assault, Disorderly Conduct, and various traffic offenses, contact the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC at 410.288.2900, to discuss your defense.

Baltimore County Police Arrested a man early Thursday morning after he was asked to leave the Au Poiton Stil on York Road. Bouncers at that location indicated that he was intoxicated and acting out of order. When police arrived they believed that he was the same individual that had made an obscene gesture at a police officer, ran a stop light and ultimately crashed into a BP gas station at York and Shawan road. The defendant was ultimately arrested at the light rail station about 40 minutes later. This would an interesting case of identity. Since the Defendant was arrested so long after the incidents and he was found at a location about a mile away, it may be hard, unless there is a positive and strong ID from many witnesses, that he was the individual responsible for the crimes.

Since the defendant is from out of state he will need an experienced bail review attorney present for him at his bail hearing in Towson. In addition, he will more likely than not have a trial date in the Baltimore County District Court in a couple of months. He will need the experience of a Criminal Lawyer in Baltimore County.

If you need a Criminal Lawyer in Timonium, Maryland, contact the Criminal Defense Firm of the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC, at 410.288.2900 or email our lead attorney, G. Randolph Rice, Jr., at RiceLawMD@gmail.com

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Baltimore County MD Bail Review Attorney

We recently represented a client who was before the Court in the District Court of Maryland for Baltimore County for a bail review hearing in Towson, Maryland.  The facts of the case in regards to the bail review hearing are as follows.  The defendant was arrested on a Friday night at his home.  He was taken before the commissioner that night and the commissioner set the bail at One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).  Since the defendant was arrested on a Friday night, his bail review was set for the following Monday morning in Towson, Maryland in the Towson District Court located at 120 E. Chesapeake Avenue, Towson, Maryland 21286.
Bail Review Lawyer for
Baltimore County, MD

You can also email a Baltimore County Bail Review Lawyer

Since the family wanted to have their loved one released as soon as possible, we met the family in my Towson Appointment Only Bail Review office right across the street from the Towson District Court at 101 E. Chesapeake Avenue, Suite 200, Towson, Maryland 21286 (410.288.2900 Available 24/7) to discuss how a bail review works and what we could do for their loved one.

The Defendant was charged with attempted first degree murder and various other related charges.  The statement of charges alleged that the defendant has been a passenger in a vehicle and when the defendant arrived on the scene, the witnesses could identify the defendant.  Yet, when the witnesses stated they saw my client attempt to murder the victim, they could not identify him by name, only by a description.  This was a key factor in the bail review hearing and convincing the Judge that the facts did not warrant such a high bail for the case.  The facts of a case are one of the factors the Court considers when determining the bail for a pending criminal charge.  The other factor is the flight risk of the defendant.  We were able to have 5 family members present for the bail review hearing showing the Court that the defendant has strong family ties to the community and he is not a flight risk.  We were successful in the bail review, arguing and being granted a reduction in the bail from One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) to Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00).  The family of the defendant was happy and we had contacted a bail bonds company to be present at the bail review hearing. This allowed for the family to complete the paperwork at the Courthouse and the defendant was released from the Baltimore County Detention Center that afternoon.

A successful Baltimore County bail review hearing requires the knowledge and experience of a Baltimore County Criminal Lawyer and Towson Bail Review Lawyer.

If you need a Baltimore County Bail Review lawyer for your family or loved one's bail review hearing, contact Attorney G. Randolph Rice, Jr., at 410.288.2900.  We are available 24/7 to discuss your bail review options and represent your loved one at the bail review hearing.

Towson Criminal Lawyer located right across the street from the Towson District Court.

Call 410.288.2900 for immediate Bail Review help.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

St. Joseph Medical Center Towson Maryland Stent Lawsuit Update

It appears that Westmoreland Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania may be facing the same troubles as St. Joseph Medical Center in regards to the implantation of unneeded stents.  The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported on March 3, 2011, that medical reviews at Westmoreland Hospital have determined that two cardiologists implanted unneeded coronary stents in at least 141 patients.
St. Joseph Medical Center
Stent Lawsuit Attorney

This similar medical malpractice claim sounds a lot like the current stent litigation in Baltimore, Maryland, where our office are currently involved in claims against Dr. Mark Midei and St. Joseph Medical Center for stents implanted unnecessarily.

If you received a stent from Dr. Mark Midei and were sent a stent letter from St. Joseph Medical Center, email our stent lawyers.

Westmoreland Hospital assembled two teams of nationally recognized cardiologist to review stent procedures in 2010.  The report found that 141 patients in 2010 may not have had enough blockage in their arteries to warrant a stent placement.  The doctors that were found to have implanted unneeded stents were; Dr. Ehab Morcos and George Bousamra.

A stent is a tiny mesh wire devise that is used to open arteries that are believed to be constricted and allows improved blood flow through those arteries. The use of stents can be successful for patients that need the procedure, but as we have found in over 600 patients from St. Joseph Medical Center, Dr. Mark Midei was implanting stents in patients that did not have the minimum blockage.

If you were a patent of Dr. Mark Midei and received a stent between January 2005 and January 2010, you still have time to file a stent claim.  Numerous claims and lawsuits have been filed in Maryland for unneeded stents placed by Dr. Mark Midei, but our office is involved with the majority of the claims and lawsuits against Dr. Midei and St. Joseph Medical Center.  If you believe that you received an unneeded stent, we can handle your claim against Dr. Mark Midei and St. Joseph Medical Center.    Contact our office at 410.288.2900 for immediate help.

If you received a stent letter from St. Joseph Medical Center indicating that you have received an unneeded stent, contact our stent lawyers at 410.288.2900, ask for St. Joseph Stent Attorney G. Randolph Rice, Jr.

All consultations are free and confidential and most information can be collected over the phone by our Maryland Stent Lawyers.  We'll send you a St. Joseph Stent Lawsuit packet and in the privacy of your home, you can complete the forms and return them to our office for review by our stent lawsuit cardiologist.

Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC
Maryland Medical Malpractice Attorneys
6914 Holabird Avenue, Suite A
Baltimore, Maryland 21222-1747
410.288.2900 (phone 24/7)
410.288.2988 (facsimile)
RiceLawMD@gmail.com
www.StJosephStents.com

Monday, April 11, 2011

Expungement of Criminal Records in Maryland


If you need a criminal law attorney in Maryland to advise you on your expungement petition, call our office to schedule a free consultation at 410.288.2900

Expungement is the removal of records from public inspection.  Records may be expunged from MVA files, Court, and police files.  Court records are not automatically expunged; to have the records removed one must file a petition for expungement with the Court.  Court records may be expunged if the following occurred: a finding of not guilty (acquittal), guilty finding of certain nuisance crimes, the charges were dismissed, the charges resulted in a probation before judgment (excluding charges of driving while under the influence or driving while impaired), the State’s Attorney entered a nolle prosequi, the Court entered a Stet, a full and unconditional pardon by the Governor was granted.
Maryland Expungement Attorney
Call 410.288.2900 for Help


The waiting period to file the petition with the Court varies depending on the outcome of the case.  An individual may file a petition for expungement immediately upon an outcome of an acquittal (not guilty), nolle prosequi, or a dismissal.  If an individual was granted probation before judgment (PBJ), then a petition may be filed three years after the probation was granted or probation ended, whichever is later.  A petition for expungement based on a guilty verdict for a specified nuisance crime may be filed three years from the date of conviction or satisfactory completion of the sentence, including probation, whichever is later.  For Stets, an individual may file a petition for expungement three years after the Stet was entered.  For cases that do not fall under these findings, an individual may file a petition for expungement at any time on a showing of good case to the Court and the Court will decide if an expungement is appropriate.

One is not entitled to an expungement of records in cases where a guilty finding was entered except for certain nuisance crimes under Maryland Criminal Procedure §10-105(a)(9), if a finding of probation before judgment, nolle prosequi, stet, a pardon or conviction of a specified publican nuisance crime, and since then the person has been convicted of another crime other than a minor traffic violation or are a defendant is a pending criminal proceeding, of a disposition of probation before judgment for a violation of driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while impaired (DWI).  In addition, if charged with multiple offenses and some of the charges were nolle prosequi but were found guilty of one or more of the other charges, then a person is not able to file a petition for expungement of the charges that were nolle prosequi.

The fee to file a petition is $30.00 however there is no fee for a verdict of not guilty (acquittal).  The process for a petition for expungement usually takes 90 days from the date of filing

If you need more information on filing for an expungement in Maryland or any other criminal related legal questions, please contact our office at 410.288.2900.

*The contents of the article do not create an attorney-client relationship and is not intended as legal advice.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

What is Maryland Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance in a Car Accident case?

Q: What is Maryland Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Insurance in a Car Accident Case?

A:  Most of my clients are unfamiliar with Personal Injury Protection (PIP) when they are involved in a Maryland automobile accident.   If you have been involved in an auto accident in Maryland, call the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC, at (410) 288-2900 to schedule a free Personal Injury Consultation
Maryland Auto Accident Law Attorney
Free Consultation
410.288.2900

PIP is a no-fault insurance policy that is attached to your car insurance.  Most people don’t even realize that they pay for PIP each time they renew their car insurance policy with a premium payment.  

You automatically have PIP coverage and the only way you would not be covered is if you waived the PIP coverage when you paid your premium.  Most people have PIP benefits of $2,500.00, but you are able to increase your PIP benefits in Maryland with a higher premium up to $10,000 of coverage.

PIP benefits are used to pay for medical and lost wages after a car accident.  At the Law Offices of G. Randolph Rice, Jr., LLC we will seek the full PIP benefits on your behalf and ensure that all payments are made according to your policy.   We also have the ability to request that the PIP benefits be reserved to pay lost wages in a car accident case.

In addition, if you do not have car insurance or are not covered under your own policy, you may be entitled to the PIP benefits of the vehicle you are riding in if you a passenger or a policy of a household member.

If you have been involved in an auto accident in Maryland, contact our office at 410.288.2900 for immediate car accident help.  Don't talk to insurance company until you talk to me.

Dundalk, Towson, Essex, Baltimore Auto Accident Attorney with offices in Dundalk and Towson Maryland.